Share
The number 11 does have extraordinary significance. However, from a comprehensive cyclical timing standpoint, the date, month, and year (11-11-2011), by themselves, are only a fraction of the charts.
While select dates and times can be more favorable for new beginnings in the way that everyday things may go more smoothly, the truth is that auspicious astrological and numerological dates and times that override personal predestination are nonexistent.
The more important Mercury is in your natal comprehensive charts and the more important transiting Mercury retrogrades are to you, the higher the chance your perception is conspicuously distorted in regards to new acquaintances during this period.
To specifically answer your question, you don’t have a “numerological type.” But you do have individuals who are much more in harmony with you than most other people, and that harmony is reflected by the collective energy of the patterns of the comprehensive charts (500+ considerations).
Astrological and numerological indicators, including Mercury retrograde, don’t make things happen, or influence anything—they symbolize and represent.
Don’t worry too much about unexpected catastrophe during this closer-to-Earth-than-usual Full Moon on Saturday since you can’t do anything to stop it. Instead, go out for a night on the town and enjoy the beautiful Moon.
The software allows organizations to completely manage their job applicants on-line, and it includes a time-saving feature called a “Share Profile” which allows co-workers to collaborate in the hiring process.
According to the Kroll Global Fraud Report, based on a survey of over 500 executives, 44% of corporate fraud is committed by insiders.
Unfortunately, modern astrology has moved too far away from authentic astrology: outlining personal predestination and character. Try as you might, you can’t cheat fate no matter how creative you get with interpretation, but you can make the most of it.
Just be aware of the fact that any pre-hire character assessment that is applicant-executed (e.g., on-line evaluation systems, multiple choice psychological testing, et al.) runs the risk of being manipulated, even if the facilitator claims otherwise, and even if the applicant is not directly self-analyzing themselves in the assessment.